This site makes extensive use of JavaScript.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser.
Live
PTR
10.2.7
PTR
10.2.6
Beta
Obama a socialist?
Post Reply
Return to board index
Post by
Deepthought
Why should someone whos rich feed some lazy people?Iam saying lazy cause the average poor dude IS lazy, anyone who wants to make some cash can do it, thats a fact.
Look at this statement, ladies and gentlemen. Look at how incredibly, majestically stupid it is.
Post by
165617
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
MyTie
In the United States, the top 10% of the population have 75% of all the wealth, the top 1% owns 33%. The bottom 40%- .2%
Interesting,,,
False, and
source
. Thanks for playing.
Post by
165617
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
MyTie
lostguide is right. Rich people have more money than poor people. Once the sheer insightfulness of that wears off, maybe we can get back to wondering what that has to do with my critique of governmental socialism.I tend to think in more capitalistic terms. I feel that the system of redispursal you describe will end up failing because that $5 million redispursed will not go very far at all in feeding the masses, like you envision, especially after the bureaucracy gets done taking their cut out of it. However, the removal of funds from the higher earners will have a definite negative impact on the economy overall, as business owners have less to invest into their company, and therefore, its workers. In order to support the social systems that cost $1 trillion, the government will have to borrow the rest, usually against the value of its currency. In a twist of irony, the devalue will be at a greater loss than the amount borrowed. This means two things: 1)it is almost impossible to pay back 2)the money in people's pockets now has less buying power. Even if every dollar the government borrows lands into the people's hands (it won't), the people will have less monetary value, but more money.My thoughts in a nutshell.
Post by
343569
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Deepthought
There are million of people that from hard work have builded ALOT, and alot of poor people are just crying waiting to get cash from sky, and thats not even deniable.
Yes, it is deniable, because it is false. Either put up some proof or shut up.
will not go very far at all in feeding the masses, like you envision, especially after the bureaucracy gets done taking their cut out of it.
Why?
Post by
343569
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Deepthought
How can i prove that? Go to streets or turn in the tv to watch it by yourself
I see
record unemployment
. Truely, an example of non-lazy people getting work! HUZZAH
Post by
343569
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
MyTie
How can i prove that? Go to streets or turn in the tv to watch it by yourself
I see
record unemployment
. Truely, an example of non-lazy people getting work! HUZZAH
It took my cousin 2 weeks to get employed. Unemployment is pure laziness. If someone aint getting a job its just cause they didn't go to school ( There are alot of public ones) or didnt go college ( There are alot of public ones once again).
A lot of public colleges? Not where I'm from.
Post by
343569
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Deepthought
Do you see these, Aazaroth? These are poverty rates for the U.S.
8.2% white people
24.7% black people
THOSE LAZY BLACKS?
Because lazyness is the only reason for unemployment, RIGHT?
No, it isn't. NOT. BY. A. LONGSHOT. And to say so ignores multiple social factors, both sexist and racist, within the modern western world.
I'm sorry that your paradise doesn't exist, Aazaroth, but it doesn't and if you think so you must have the mental age of a child.
Post by
165617
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
MyTie
It is hard to find a job, sometimes.
Post by
343569
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
165617
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
MyTie
Aazaroth - I think you should be careful about forming opinions based solely on statistics and your perception of the causes of those statistics.
Another tip, which I don't know if you want or not: choose your words and methods for arugeing carefully. I wouldn't bring up race when arguing about economics. It is too touchy of a subject, and makes it hard to stay on the topic of economics.
Post by
343569
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
165617
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post Reply
You are not logged in. Please
log in
to post a reply or
register
if you don't already have an account.