This site makes extensive use of JavaScript.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser.
Live
PTR
10.2.7
PTR
10.2.6
Beta
My idea involving eugenics
Post Reply
Return to board index
Post by
Adamsm
See, comments like that, where you think your own narrowminded little view makes you smarter then everyone proves you have no idea what your talking about. Give up now, this idea was stupid when you first put it up, it's still stupid now, and if it ever went into production, you would be the first in line for thinking of it.
I still wouldn't be on the line because I wouldn't want to.
One point of this whole thing is that:
People who want to go surgery which disables their ability to reproduce just for 1000€, shouldn't reproduce for the sake of our well-being.
In the bolded section, where does it say they 'want' to go into the surgery? You make it seem like this is all based on money... but it's not; it's based on your own bigioted and racists views against those you see as low class. When you were given examples of the 'upper' class doing the same thing the low class does, in fact does it more and easier as they have money... you shrug your shoulders and say no they don't or their smarter. Then, when we give examples of the opposite of that statement, you still say your right, that not everyone is like our examples....
Well guess what genius! Not ever person who is 'low' class is a drug user, an alcoholic or a vandal!
Seriously, do us all a favour and stop with this, your topic has been proved wrong across 9 pages, just give it up. This is an idiotic idea thought up by a 17 year old silverspoon in the mouth putz.
Post by
229791
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Adamsm
Tell me... What bad stuff do upper and middle - class people do ? Much less bad stuff than lower-class I must say.The exact same thing you blame the poor class of doing.
As for your copy paste, I'm not responding in that I don't think I can keep my language clean enough for the board to do so.
Seriously though, let the damn topic drop, you were proved wrong, you've proven your a bigot, a racist, and an elitist.
Name one person in this thread who has agreed with you 100% that this is a 'good idea'.
Post by
229791
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Adamsm
Middle and Higher - class people don't break other people's possessions just for fun (example: pretty much all poor people areas are full of graffitis).So the bored middle/high class idiots who walk down a street with baseball bats, golf clubs and other objects of that nature, and proceed to smash every car window and shop window.... that's not doing it for fun? And I've seen 'middle class' people spray painting walls and other property here in my town.
People don't want to get stigmatized as "nazis", "elitists", "idiots", "trolls", "stupid" and "bigots".Was that suppose to be a cute way of saying someone does agree but they won't say anything? This is the internet after all, but I haven't seen a single post supporting your little ideal here.
Post by
229791
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Adamsm
I've never seen or never heard, and if your middle class does these things... I don't want to know what your lower class does.
It's called the news.... might want to watch it.
An interesting idea, but i don't htink it could work in theory.
The real problem with your plan is saying that poor people and drug addicts shouldn't have children. They can still have fully functioning children grow up to contribute to society - that has nothing to do with genetics.
Said it was interesting... how is that saying it's good thing, especially with the bolded part there..........
Post by
Hyperspacerebel
WHEN YOU DRINK BOOZE THE BOOZE MOLECULES LATCH ON TO YOUR DNA AND MAKE DRUNK DNA THAT GETS TURNED INTO SPERM AND EGGS AND BECOMES A BABY BORN WITH
ORIGINAL SIN
ORIGINAL DRUNKENNESS WHICH MEANS HE'S GOING TO GROW UP TO BE A MENACE TO SOCIETY AND HIS KIDS WILL BE SUPER DNA DRUNK AND THOSE KIDS WILL BE SUPER DUPER DNA DRUNK AND PRETTY SOON THEY'LL HAVE A HIGHER ALCOHOL CONTENT THEN THE BOOZE THEY ARE DRINKING AND THEN THE UNIVERSE WILL ASPLODE!
Post by
229791
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Hyperspacerebel
Yeah
You didn't even read your link did you...
There is a difference between identifying an attitude that runs in a family and discovering a gene that contributes to alcoholism. The HealthDay title of the previous article "Heredity May Play Part in Drinking Habits" is misleading.
There is no evidence whatsoever that attitudes toward drinking are hereditary.
There are familial, societal, and cultural attitudes toward alcohol consumption but this does not mean that they have a genetic basis.
I'm loling.
Post by
Adamsm
It's positive feedback when compared to other posts in this thread.Uh huh.....
Post by
229791
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Adamsm
You didn't even read your link did you...Well the kids are going to be raised by their parents, and if their parent is alcoholic the kid might take bad influence.
There is some proof that alcoholism is hereditary.
There is no evidence whatsoever that attitudes toward drinking are hereditary. There are familial, societal, and cultural attitudes toward alcohol consumption but this does not mean that they have a genetic basis.
Post by
Hyperspacerebel
You didn't even read your link did you...Well the kids are going to be raised by their parents, and if their parent is alcoholic the kid might take bad influence.
There is some proof that alcoholism is hereditary.
You, my friend, don't even understand the words you're using.
Finish/retake
high school
primary school, then we'll talk.
Edited because I just asked my 12 year old brother and he knew what hereditary meant.
Post by
229791
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
438256
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
229791
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
260787
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
TheMediator
How Hyperspacerebel argues -
A) Take a given example to the extreme
B) Suggest that the extreme is wrong because some subset of people disagree with that extreme
B) Imply that that the original example is wrong because of the disagreement with the extreme
It just looks so bad to read.
Post by
229791
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post Reply
You are not logged in. Please
log in
to post a reply or
register
if you don't already have an account.