This site makes extensive use of JavaScript.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser.
Live
PTR
10.2.7
PTR
10.2.6
Beta
Creating Threads
Post Reply
Return to board index
Post by
273605
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Adamsm
Heh, I think this thread will fall apart in less then hour, I'll check back at 6:30 to see if I'm right.
Post by
Monday
Debates FTW
RP's FTW
Post by
107106
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Monday
Heh, I think this thread will fall apart in less then hour, I'll check back at 6:30 to see if I'm right.
Time: 5:24
Time in one hour: 6:24
6:30>6:24
6:30 is more than an hour, sir.
You're doing it wrong.
What clock are you using hm?
Post by
260787
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Adamsm
Heh, well, semi-dead, and off track, I wins.
Post by
Orranis
Debates FTW
RP's FTW
QFT.
Though I barely ever create threads, just participate.
Post by
273605
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Interest
Sigh.
Really now Dragon?
Post by
TMSama
Creating random threads does seem to be all the rage nowadays... :D
Post by
Interest
Creating random threads does seem to be all the rage nowadays... :D
Indeed it does. This is why I just spam posts. Eats far less data. =P
Post by
Adamsm
Creating random threads does seem to be all the rage nowadays... :D
Indeed it does. This is why I just spam posts. Eats far less data. =P
Heh, I've only ever made one thread in randomness.
Post by
cheezedood21
Pretty much threads that I can simply contribute to. I used to enjoy posting in the forum game threads. But, I suppose I just outgrew them. Although, I do post in one or two a week or so.
Creating random threads does seem to be all the rage nowadays... :D
Indeed it does. This is why I just spam posts. Eats far less data. =P
Heh, I've only ever made one thread in randomness.
*Looks up Adamsm's thread*
Post by
Adamsm
Heh, it didn't last long, but that was alright.
Post by
129077
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Adamsm
OBJECTION!
Adam claimed that he thinks that this thread will fall apart in less than an hour.
He then stated that he will check back at 6:30.
They are not the same statement. Your Honor.
I REST MY CASE
Heh, I don't mind. I meant what I said; I bet it would fall apart in under an hour (thanks all for the time comments, proving my point), and I'd check back at 6:30, which was an hour and 6 minutes.
Post by
148723
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
irishsnout
Heh, I think this thread will fall apart in less then hour, I'll check back at 6:30 to see if I'm right.
Time: 5:24
Time in one hour: 6:24
6:30>6:24
6:30 is more than an hour, sir.
You're doing it wrong.
What clock are you using hm?
OBJECTION!
Adam claimed that he thinks that this thread will fall apart in less than an hour.
He then stated that he will check back at 6:30.
They are not the same statement. Your Honor.
I REST MY CASE
I like threads wqith quotes so I can skip to the end
tldr quotes good
Post by
TMSama
I like threads that are about threads.
Yo dawg, I heard you like threads, so we put a thread in your thread so you can post while you post!
Post Reply
You are not logged in. Please
log in
to post a reply or
register
if you don't already have an account.