This site makes extensive use of JavaScript.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser.
Live
PTR
10.2.7
PTR
10.2.6
Beta
All Hail Hellscream's Horde
Post Reply
Return to board index
Post by
92105
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
GVHB
I approve. It would work to differentiate the horde under the rule of Hellscream from the one under Thrall's.
Post by
taurenmoo812
In a way I agree with this, since I'm starting to go on the idea that this horde thats coming in cataclysm won't be my horde that I've defended so passionatly, but another one like Rends horde.
However, my horde characters will be trapped in having to join with this horde without finding his horde to go to, as with any other character I create.
What Would be good though is there being a cival war between those loyal to the true horde (Thralls) and Garroshs horde, and a battle takes place.
Post by
Adamsm
A kind of Fel Horde Lite, if you will.Better then actually calling it the Fel or Dark Horde again.
Post by
GVHB
In a way I agree with this, since I'm starting to go on the idea that this horde thats coming in cataclysm won't be my horde that I've defended so passionatly, but another one like Rends horde.
However, my horde characters will be trapped in having to join with this horde without finding his horde to go to, as with any other character I create.
What Would be good though is there being a cival war between those loyal to the true horde (Thralls) and Garroshs horde, and a battle takes place.
Probably that will happen.
Post by
taurenmoo812
Christ I just had a scary thought..
what is the two lines are drawn and you fight against hellscreams horde with thralls horde, and in a fight at the end, Garrosh is defeated, but Thrall offers him a chance at redemption, in having both there hordes become one, and both he and thrall stand as leaders together..
yeah.. thats kinda scary idea..
Post by
Adamsm
That's more or less what I'm hoping at the end, that Garrosh doesn't die, and actually get's a real redemption.... and not an 11th hour thing either.
Post by
GVHB
Thrall still would be more prominent. He would care of politics and Garrosh of warfare.
Post by
92105
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
451455
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
taurenmoo812
Maybe thats it. Maybe Garrosh becomes the war leader, but Thrall is the defacto leader, the ideals of warchief changed, and Thrall is given a new title as leader to all.
Post by
GVHB
Thrall
<Peacechief of the Horde>
Post by
Adamsm
Thrall can still be the Warchief; just put Garrosh into the same position Doomhammer was for Blackhand.
Post by
taurenmoo812
Thrall
<Peacechief of the Horde>
ok maybe that idea doesn't wash so well. But still, both sides leading the horde is something I'd live with. There would still be conflict, but not without hope for peace in the future.
Post by
306612
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Adamsm
Christ I just had a scary thought..
what is the two lines are drawn and you fight against hellscreams horde with thralls horde, and in a fight at the end, Garrosh is defeated, but Thrall offers him a chance at redemption, in having both there hordes become one, and both he and thrall stand as leaders together..
yeah.. thats kinda scary idea..
Oh my gawd, that is so scary, its going to give me nightmares for weeks. Garrosh... getting redeemed... /shudders
Other than being a @#$%head, what did he do again? It wouldn't be so much redemption than beating some sense into the kid.
Eh, all the doomsayers are saying he's going to turn the Horde into the Dark Horde again lol.
Post by
Morec0
For Garrosh's Horde! Lok'tar Ogar!
Post by
306612
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Morec0
He's managed to lead the Horde fairly well in Northrend. Warsong Hold, Conquest Hold, Agmar's Hammer, all of those are founded by the force he led into Northrend.
I belive that he has the potential to be a great Warchief.
Post by
taurenmoo812
He's managed to lead the Horde fairly well in Northrend. Warsong Hold, Conquest Hold, Agmar's Hammer, all of those are founded by the force he led into Northrend.
I belive that he has the potential to be a great Warchief.
No he didn't. Thats a pretty flatlined assumption. He failed to control the warsong as they attacked the broken front.
Also, everyone blames Thrall for the creation of the forsaken blight, but the blight was actully created in northrend by the forsaken there, and since Garrosh was in charge of the horde forces in northrend, it was him that failed to take notice of the fact.
He failed to look at the greater threat of yogg saron, and didn't do anything in icecrown except call alliance pigs, and stand in the front door of the citadel well other heroes went into it.
Some cold hard facts for you. He fails as a leader, has done ever since nagrand.
Post Reply
You are not logged in. Please
log in
to post a reply or
register
if you don't already have an account.