This site makes extensive use of JavaScript.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser.
Live
PTR
10.2.7
PTR
10.2.6
Beta
The Garrosh Thread
Post Reply
Return to board index
Post by
Monday
I actually see Garrosh making steps to restore his honor.
/shrug
Post by
taurenmoo812
Congratulations, you found a post I made responding to someone being a condescending ass in response to a completely non-hostile question about the removal of subversion and death knight threat. Kudos.
Bottom line: Garrosh was written horribly from the Echos of Doom patch, throughout Wrath and Blizzard shoehorned some lore in via novel in an attempt to win us over.
Spot on.
When are people gonna get the fact he is just so badly written. Even Metzen himself said he's a trainwreck.
But then Garrosh appears to be the appeal of the numpty crowd, for people who don't know jack about the lore, and equate someone like chuck norris with a wow character.
Post by
229054
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Monday
We're all fanboys about something.
Post by
229054
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
306612
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Interest
We're all fanboys about something.
I know right?When are people gonna get the fact he is just so badly written. Even Metzen himself said he's a trainwreck.
Dude, when you say something like that, you need the EXACT QUOTE plox.
I would like to see the source for this as well.
Post by
632573
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
229054
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Monday
I think its very likely he's talking about the lore panel from Blizzcon. But, if I'm recall correctly, what Metzen said was that Garrosh was a controversial character by purpose, since he's the opposite of Thrall, and that there's much more character development waiting for him. Or something like that.
Opposite of Thrall = Train Wreck in Tauren's mind.
Post by
306612
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
FarseerLolotea
And that's a classic tactic for someone who doesn't quite grasp the concept of conversational debate. Cry troll, when the person who isn't trolling points it out, you cry troll even more.And
that
was a "NO U" with an attempt to be patronizing in the mix.
Congratulations, you found a post I made responding to someone being a condescending ass in response to a completely non-hostile question about the removal of subversion and death knight threat. Kudos.Wait, now. Even if we acknowledge that
he
was being a "condescending ass," how were
you
not being even
more
of one there?
As far as I know, Garrosh being a horribly written has never been is dispute.No, it hasn't.
All I could make out of this thread was 3 kinds of people around here. First, those with a vain hope that Garrosh will be ''fixed''; Second, those who, although acknowledging his stupidity and schizophrenia, like the fact that the Horde isn't acting like victims in the park - or rather that Thrall, a good guy more or like destined to be neutral, is gone; Third, there are those who would still hate it all even if Garrosh was fixed in a way that even his most brutal measures and behavior can be defended by Horde supporters somehow.
The similarities between those 3 kinds is that they are all fanboys.And is it also "fanboy" behavior to think that Garrosh is simply not salvageable?
And I believe the comment about him was that we shouldn't focus on him too much. Or something.
Post by
632573
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Skreeran
Dude, you're trolling. We all know it. Stop.
Post by
229054
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Interest
You're acknowledgment
I don't know why but I found this fail amusing.
Post by
632573
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Skreeran
But you are expressing your opinion in a caustic and derogatory manner. Which is trolling.
Post by
FarseerLolotea
The point is still valid, no matter how you try to spin it with memes. Okay...you're going to jump on me for using a meme?
Fine. That part of your post added up to "I know you are, but what am I?" Same difference, and it was
still
patronizing.
Some people on the internet are incapable of coping with being disagreed with or being wrong; in such times they resort to accusations of trolling.Wait, wait...do you really believe
that's
why you're being called out for trolling here? The mind boggles. (And I'm sure you'll take a cheap shot at me for that.)
Your acknowledgment simply isn't required; water is wet and fire is hot, no need to confirm blatant truths. You're grasping at straws.The hell I am.
You
are the one whose posts in that thread—to say nothing of this one—stood out as especially condescending and snotty.
As Skreeran pointed out, you've done just about nothing but talk trash and self-aggrandize.
That
is what makes your behavior trolling.
Post by
632573
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post Reply
You are not logged in. Please
log in
to post a reply or
register
if you don't already have an account.