This site makes extensive use of JavaScript.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser.
Live
PTR
10.2.7
PTR
10.2.6
Beta
The Garrosh Thread
Post Reply
Return to board index
Post by
Interest
I'm at Hated with Faith in Humanity. Can't seem to gain rep. Bastards.You, sir, win the Interwebs.
Lol, I'm actually at a rep below Hated atm.
You don't want to know what it is, but you'll find out when you hit it.
Post by
306612
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
229054
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Gnub
No idea if this was mentioned in the previous page, but I do like Garrosh's speech when you click him now.
"Live by these words: LOK'TAR OGAR - Victory...
or death!
"
Orc's got attitude. Me like. \o/
Post by
taurenmoo812
This is how I see the situation. Thrall was essentally the adult ruler, Garrosh is a child.
The older warriors and heroes of the horde, that ones who survived the previous wars, or have grown to understand whats more important then fighting, are those that know better then to follow the same mistakes of old. The ones that follow Garrosh are the younger orcs, who don't know what the previous generation lost, or care, they simply see the war and fighting and want that.
Until the horde, the new generation grows up and realises this, they set to repeat the mistakes of the last generation. But when what is basicly a child ruler commanding them to think like he does, its going to take a long time for this to happen.
Post by
Monday
But then Garrosh learns, and becomes and adult ruler.
/shrug
Post by
taurenmoo812
But then Garrosh learns, and becomes and adult ruler.
/shrug
Did Grom ever stop being Grom?
I have to say, the argument that 'Garrosh will mature and become a good and intelligent leader' is wishful thinking and always has been. Garrosh is set as this character he is for a reason, not so he can develop into a doomhammer or Thrall type leader, but so it will show the horde repeating the same mistakes it once did, and learn from it.
He is, after all, Thralls foil.
Post by
Monday
But then Garrosh learns, and becomes and adult ruler.
/shrug
Did Grom ever stop being Grom?
Is Garrosh Grom?
Post by
GVHB
Garrosh is already showing hints of him learning from the elder leaders of the Horde (Saurfang and High Chieftain Cliffwalker).
He can develop into a competent leader without becoming like Thrall.
Post by
taurenmoo812
Garrosh is already showing hints of him learning from the elder leaders of the Horde (Saurfang and High Chieftain Cliffwalker).
You mean when he's not killing the elder leaders spitting on the rest calling them scum?
Seriously. When that girl as blizzcon asked Metzen 'are we going to get a warchief out of his guy, or just another angry hellscream?' Metzen actully made a clear point of how Garrosh's story is no way near as important as Thralls in this, and instead of answering 'Garrosh will mature', he basicly told us 'don't get attached to Garrosh'.
Your hoping for more then whats been given.
Post by
Adamsm
Did Grom ever stop being Grom?I don't know; was he Grom when he saved Thrall's life and broke the Fel Blood Curse from all orcs affected by the Blood of Mannoroth? Was he Grom when he showed mercy to Thrall, by not letting his Warsong clan members kill the human child they captured? In short...when wasn't he Grom?
Edit: In other words....comments like that are just things to set up showing a certain mind set.
Post by
Monday
Seriously. When that girl as blizzcon asked Metzen 'are we going to get a warchief out of his guy, or just another angry hellscream?' Metzen actully made a clear point of how Garrosh's story is no way near as important as Thralls in this, and instead of answering 'Garrosh will mature', he basicly told us 'don't get attached to Garrosh'.
You mean when he's not killing the elder leaders spitting on the rest calling them scum?
Like who? He doesn't agree with Vol'jin, that doesn't mean he hates everyone else and is evil.
In fact, he seems to be maturing under the tutelage of Saurfang and the like.
Post by
taurenmoo812
Oh get over it.
He refered to Vol'jin as being no better then scum and as being no benefit to the horde. And this crap about how he showed remorse at killing cairne, he didn't, he reveled in killing him and only showed self grief for himself when he learned he was a pwn.
Interperate it however you want to make yourself feel better, but I read the shattering too, and despite your own thought on it, I did Not get a better outlook on Garrosh, infact I saw him the worse for it, him showing how truly calous he was and self absorbed.
anything else your expecting from him his wishful thinking, and I can see theres nothing in arguing the point with you.
Post by
Adamsm
I can see theres nothing in arguing the point with you.Wow, hate to say it again for like the 10th time but....Irony, thy name is Taurenmoo.
Post by
Monday
I can see theres nothing in arguing the point with you.Wow, hate to say it again for like the 10th time but....Irony, thy name is Taurenmoo.
QFT
Oh get over it.
You get over. Garrosh looks like he's actually becoming a non-retard character. So sad.
And this crap about how he showed remorse at killing cairne, he didn't, he reveled in killing him and only showed self grief for himself when he learned he was a pwn.
I was under the impression he was horribly saddened by it.
Also, you still didn't cite your crap about Metzen.
Post by
taurenmoo812
I can see theres nothing in arguing the point with you.Wow, hate to say it again for like the 10th time but....Irony, thy name is Taurenmoo.
whatever, I stand by my conviction the same as you do.
Post by
Monday
Also, you still didn't cite your crap about Metzen.
Post by
taurenmoo812
I was under the impression he was horribly saddened by it.
Also, you still didn't cite your crap about Metzen.
Try rereading the book, the only 'sadness' was for himself.
And why do I need to mark up what metzen said because you didn't see it. Go watch the video yourself.
Then again based on your opinion of garrosh from the shattering, interpretation of whatever metzen said would likely come out different there too.
Post by
Monday
I never read the book, I'm going by what we see in Cata.
And why do I need to mark up what metzen said because you didn't see it. Go watch the video yourself.
Because forum etiquette states that if you're making a point, you have to provide the examples, not make somebody else go prove you right. Prove me wrong, then we'll talk.
Also: Also, you still didn't cite your crap about Metzen.
Post by
Adamsm
I can see theres nothing in arguing the point with you.Wow, hate to say it again for like the 10th time but....Irony, thy name is Taurenmoo.
whatever, I stand by my conviction the same as you do.
Except, the irony there is.....your accusing Funden of the same crap you pull all the time, but I'm guessing the irony is lost on you.
But hey, whatever works.
Post Reply
You are not logged in. Please
log in
to post a reply or
register
if you don't already have an account.