This site makes extensive use of JavaScript.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser.
Live
PTR
10.2.7
PTR
10.2.6
Beta
DW Frost hit cap
Post Reply
Return to board index
Post by
795341
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
dervasavred
Check EJ.
White hit cap is not needed.
Post by
353990
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
dervasavred
8%. Even fury warriors don't go for the hard cap anymore (which is 27%, btw), and dk's never did regardless of spec. Plus, merely attempting it would nerf your other stats (and subsequently, abilities) into oblivion.
Hit to soft cap, expertise to soft cap (26 rating), then strength > mastery > crit > extra hit > haste.
5%. DW has NoCS.
Post by
353990
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
131584
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
448027
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
239567
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
784217
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
138583
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
117348
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
sfagias
I wouldnt even waste time trying to figure out the dw stuff. Unholy 2 hander is pretty OP.
Unless you just like the look/animation of DW and that its cool, in that case go for it.
Well, UH 2H is not that far ahead from Frost DW so if someone finds Frost's play style more attractive then it is not a waste. Especially if you look at the buffs it seems to be getting.
Post by
117348
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
sfagias
You are talking about look/animation. I am talking about playstyle. Personally I find unholly extremely dull and I am pretty sure I am more effective with my frost specc than my UH just because I find it being a chore more than fun. Plus, imo you should be looking into it since after UH's nerfs and the buffs frost gets it might turn out to be the optimal specc, therefore making looking into the specc not a waste of time. I read your post fine maybe you should do the same thing?
Post by
117348
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
sfagias
-.- That phrase was used in order to give advice, at least that is what I perceived it to be, making it sound like it would indeed be a waste of time for anyone. I am sorry if I was mistaken there, but the wording on your third post is much clearer.
Post by
117348
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
sfagias
hehe don't worry about it, it was a misunderstanding and these things do happen it was partly my fault too for thinking that way anyway :)
Post Reply
You are not logged in. Please
log in
to post a reply or
register
if you don't already have an account.