This site makes extensive use of JavaScript.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser.
Live
PTR
10.2.7
PTR
10.2.6
Beta
Prowl Macro Problem
Post Reply
Return to board index
Post by
WorldChaser
I was hoping to for some advice on a macro problem my brother and I have encountered.
This is the stealth macro I use:
#showtooltip Prowl
/cast Cat Form; Prowl
I am able to spam this macro with no problems, it does not unstealth me or take me out of Cat Form when I spam it. When my brother uses this macro on his computer and spams it, it will continually take him in and out of Cat Form. We tried adding !Cat Form to the macro and that stopped the Cat Form problem but then he come out of stealth when he spams it. It just seems weird to me that I have no problems with this macro but he does. Any advice?
Post by
129046
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
707835
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
pelf
I can see that for Cat Form, but I sometimes use my stealth button to drop stealth. The macro, though, should be fine.
Post by
iefke
I had similar problems when using my Prowl macro from my 85 druid on a low level druid. Turns out, since not all forms are available at lower levels, stance numbering is incremented as soon as you learn another form.
For example, until you get Bear Form, Cat Form is stance:1, and as soon as you learn Bear Form, Bear Form becomes stance:1 and Cat Form is "renumbered" to stance:2. (not sure about the exact numbers though!)
This only applies as long as you don't have all the forms available for your druid. Play around with the stance numbers to get it right!
Post by
pelf
iefke is right about that. In the past where there were actual quests for forms, you could skip the quests and your stance numbers would all be off, depending on where that stance would have been inserted.
Post by
curlymon
iefke is right about that. In the past where there were actual quests for forms, you could skip the quests and your stance numbers would all be off, depending on where that stance would have been inserted.
Have a friend who to this day still does not have Aquatic form "because it is too damn ugly"
Post by
Nipah
iefke is right about that. In the past where there were actual quests for forms, you could skip the quests and your stance numbers would all be off, depending on where that stance would have been inserted.
Have a friend who to this day still does not have Aquatic form "because it is too damn ugly"
I think it's so damn ugly it's cute.
Especially when I go flying out of the water and land on the shore... that split second you're still in aquatic form but out of water = priceless.
Post by
109094
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
LookOut
yea I like that moment too. I sometimes wish that simply jumping out of the water didnt drop you out of Aquatic Form like it does now
I actually dropped out of form due to hitting some rubble in the water today (on the surface ofc) o_o
Post by
129046
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
pelf
Seals can't breathe out of water, you know.
Oh, right.
Post by
curlymon
Seals can't breathe out of water, you know.
Oh, right.
Naw it's the fact that we'd have a 25% movement speed and they don't want us to accidentally "slow" ourselves... Blizz has our back!
Post Reply
You are not logged in. Please
log in
to post a reply or
register
if you don't already have an account.