This site makes extensive use of JavaScript.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser.
Classic Theme
Thottbot Theme
Randomness = /b/?
Post Reply
Return to board index
Post by
148723
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Fennrahn
Wait so let me get this straight....
Wait, so let me get this straight:
You claimed he ruined randomness, but have no proof of the ruin whatsoever because your too lazy to dig through his past posts to find "proof"
You claim that Master of Disguise ruined Randomness, but have no proof of the so-called "ruining," namely because you seem to be too lazy to dig through his past posts.
Response: I claimed that he was a helping factor in said ruination, yes. Also, I mentioned already that it was outside of his last 250 posts, so there was practically no chance in hell that I would find them. The Wowhead forums search is about as helpful as Michael Jackson in this situation, and Google isn't much better.
Wow and I thought you were actually remotely intelligent, until you know, you started a QQ post with no proof.
Wow, and I thought you may actually be REMOTELY intelligent, until, you know, you started a QQ thread with no proof.
Response: 1. It's clear you've never seen me before, so you had no way of thinking I was "actually remotely intelligent." Also, as I've said, eyewitness evidence. You'll learn about it when you're older.
Find proof and MAYBE we may remotely believe you.
Find some proof of your claims, and, one day, there may be a remote chance that anyone will believe you.
Response: Addressed in above responses.
Post by
309832
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
278900
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Dogel
But back on topic: Randomness isn't any more degraded than it's always been honestly. For a while it seemed like we were all going down in a blaze of fail, but I think it's gotten better since then.
You obviously have never been here about a year ago.
Post by
Fennrahn
Vote yes to more DECENT moderators, less to those who are, ah, "not fit" for their positions.
wait, when have the wowhead users been able to vote for the people who mod for us?
this isnt P:C mate, get your facts straight.
(all rhymes are unintended)
Wow... are you an--
What I meant is metaphorical--meaning that you should not put up with the bad moderator-ship-ness.
Also,
But back on topic: Randomness isn't any more degraded than it's always been honestly. For a while it seemed like we were all going down in a blaze of fail, but I think it's gotten better since then.
You obviously have never been here about a year ago.
^ This
Post by
309832
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
148723
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
278900
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Dogel
Dogel: Nope, just here since January (November really, but I didn't join till January), so I can't witness to anything before then.
The decline of the forums actually started before this, but at alot slower pace.
Then the new members showed up, and honestly, it sank like a brick.
(I've been watching this from time to time.)
Then it was better for a bit, and it went down again.
Picture reference: /\__\ \_\
in order: great, slowly went bad, calmed down, badbadbadbabdbabdbadbabdasjdasdjk, calmed, sinking again.
Post by
Dogel
iirc, this topic was brought up by MyTie at the beginning of the summer, and caused a group of us to start P:C, seeing as we cant actually do anything about the mods here, whether we like them or not *cough* Corgan *cough*
I think Corgan's a good guy. He's a <ray of sunshine> sometimes, but I know he knows his limits.
edited for quote.
Post by
Kristopher
P:C was started for many different reasons, but I adopted it for this current one it is now. Yes and Corgan is pretty cool.
Post by
Fennrahn
Because eyewitness evidence on the internet brings families together and stops 'cold hard criminals' in their tracks, hm?
Can you tell me why you dislike MasterOfDisguise? Did you try out for blogger when he did? Did he steal your position? Are you mad that you're not part of the Wowhead Weekly Review when you were originally part of the Wowhead Week In Review team?
1. Respond to my question first :D
Yeah, you've played me off as being a kiss-ass, an idiot, and just an all-around ignorant person who goes with the flow.
You, sir, are inevitably wrong.
Do you have proof?
Also, this may be helpful.
2. Okay, fine, I'll say, but I'm expecting a response to my question as well.
1. I dislike him on a personal level because on all accounts of interaction with him, he never seizes to be stuck up and a general jerk. I dislike him on a more broad level because he only is doing the WWIR to show off a fake e-peen, and, more importantly, he !@#$ed up Randomness and refuses to admit to it, ever.
2. I never "tried out for blogger"-- that wasn't what the Wowhead Week in Review was meant to do. It was meant to
HELP OUT THE COMMUNITY
, not to wave an e-peen around in the air screaming "I'm a Wowhead blogger!11"
3. See below. I was never even contacted about the revival about the WWIR.
4. I'm only irritated by the fact that nobody ever bothered to tell me about their revival.
Post by
309832
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
278900
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Interest
I'm sorry, but no.
Post by
273605
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
243831
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Dogel
Being in the middle of both parties in this drama, I am finding this wonderfully amusing.
Just so you know.
Post by
309832
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post Reply
You are not logged in. Please
log in
to post a reply or
register
if you don't already have an account.