This site makes extensive use of JavaScript.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser.
Classic Theme
Thottbot Theme
Rogue forum - MY opinion on rogues
Post Reply
Return to board index
Post by
105944
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
335633
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
105944
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
335633
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
462750
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Caperon
Click the link in my sig.
That is all.
Not helpful at all.
Although it made me smile.
Post by
KidB
Rogue DPS
This is actually quite accurate.
Post by
604495
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
393224
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
447547
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
78077
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
335633
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
asakawa
affliction warlocks have been pretty easy for a few patches now (since they removed two of the DoTs that needed casting). however the recent "DoT refresh" mechanic has introduced a complex, counter-intuitive mechanic which, if pulled off, is the key to relatively massive numbers. it's sort of artificially hard at the moment.
Post by
Caperon
affliction warlocks have been pretty easy for a few patches now (since they removed two of the DoTs that needed casting). however the recent "DoT refresh" mechanic has introduced a complex, counter-intuitive mechanic which, if pulled off, is the key to relatively massive numbers. it's sort of artificially hard at the moment.
"My class is hard because I play it" doesn't fly in these forums.
Post by
asakawa
did my comment sound like i was saying it was hard and that makes warlocks awesome? if so then you misread the tone or i misrepresented my opinion.
the rolling corruption mechanic is not a good thing. it allows people who read forums a lot get a 232 trinket to perform better than 264 ones. it's broken in every meaningful way.
my point was that the warlock affliction rotation is not, in itself, at all difficult. that idea is one that still lingers from the naxx/ulduar era.
Post by
Caperon
did my comment sound like i was saying it was hard and that makes warlocks awesome? if so then you misread the tone or i misrepresented my opinion.
the rolling corruption mechanic is not a good thing. it allows people who read forums a lot get a 232 trinket to perform better than 264 ones. it's broken in every meaningful way.
my point was that the warlock affliction rotation is not, in itself, at all difficult. that idea is one that still lingers from the naxx/ulduar era.
edit: on a side note this thread was a failure from the instant of its inception and has actually managed to degrade from that low point into the worst kind of silly point-scoring. reading through some comments, my only conclusion is that you're all wrong. it's made some otherwise intelligent regular posters come across very badly.
Wasnt actually meant towards you, but towards SheeoCo.
Post by
asakawa
>.< my humblest apologies.
Post by
Caperon
>.< my humblest apologies.
Its ok =D
Post by
335633
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
asakawa
no need to apologise. it's a super minor point that i just thought i'd clarify since i "do locks" and i was reading the thread.
Post Reply
You are not logged in. Please
log in
to post a reply or
register
if you don't already have an account.