This site makes extensive use of JavaScript.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser.
Classic Theme
Thottbot Theme
Worst Class or Bad Player?
Post Reply
Return to board index
Post by
Maelwys
^You mean, reliable CC for an extended period of time from which you can start a nuke from or super form of interrupt.
Post by
321203
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
237145
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
225744
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Gnomespwn
Sorry guys, but i have no pity at all for locks. For 2 years they were writing "Locks are not OP l2p noobs". Now you got nerfed to the state of regular, not OP class. Welcome to real world mates.
Post by
Preciouss
I'm just curious, but do you apply the same standards of "most locks and hunters are just noobs and so they think they are UP" to all those rogues out there who just seem to dominate anyone and everything no matter who the rogue? Do you just assume that "all rogues are professionals" along with your assumption that "the majority of locks and hunters are noobs"? Because at the end of the day, when the numbers in the millions for statistics show that certain classes get dominated by all other classes and some classes dominate all other classes....those large numbers objectively eliminate skill from the comparison.
Post by
Hurono
Worst PvP Class = Shaman. Locks at least get SOME good attacks, Shamans though? Sheesh how many do you see in the arena ratings of any spec?
Post by
Niniveh
Worst PvP Class = Shaman. Locks at least get SOME good attacks, Shamans though? Sheesh how many do you see in the arena ratings of any spec?
This many?
http://www.realmhistory.net/arena-statistics/class-breakdown.html
Post by
Hurono
Wow I thought Shamans were rough on the edges WTF!
Post by
287129
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
293348
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
irharry
Sorry guys, but i have no pity at all for locks. For 2 years they were writing "Locks are not OP l2p noobs". Now you got nerfed to the state of regular, not OP class. Welcome to real world mates.
I'm not here to QQ, I'm simply stating fact when i say that locks are not "regular," they are very, very sub regular.
check out the arena stats
Again I'm not here to whinge. I've only just started PVP'ing again after the xpac, and despite the state of the lock class, I'm enjoying it. The fact is though that warlocks are very, very under-represented at the higher ends of pvp, right across the board. We are bottom by a significant enough margin that you have no choice but to acknowledge that there are serious issues with the state of warlock pvp, at the present time.
I realise this link has been posted elsewhere, and I realise that others have made similar comments.
Post by
Pixels
The thing is that their representation isn't 0%. So, if it is possible for some warlocks to get high ratings than why is it not possible for you?
Post by
Niniveh
The thing is that their representation isn't 0%. So, if it is possible for some warlocks to get high ratings than why is it not possible for you?
This is very lame argument.
Post by
265486
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
79146
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Aevitas
Actually I think locks are completely nerfed.
I'd have to disagree. You're probably making a comparison to when they were OP. If you know how to play a lock, you shouldn't have many problems.
I have been playing lock ever since the beta, I know how to play and still it feels rather gimped.
Post Reply
You are not logged in. Please
log in
to post a reply or
register
if you don't already have an account.