This site makes extensive use of JavaScript.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser.
Classic Theme
Thottbot Theme
Drop by and say hi! (Recycle Bin)
Post Reply
Return to board index
Post by
Monday
There's a new goldeneye?
cooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooool
also morning :)
Yeah. Came out last November.OH LOOK IT'S A DHAZY
Also, I love my
visualization
software. That's not even a trippy song.
You should run Equation by Aphex Twin through that software and see what you come up with...
I take no blame for driving you insane.
Post by
Interest
I really wish that earthquake in China hadn't happened so that the nuclear power plant wouldn't be in danger of exploding. It's really scary to think about. :/
that earthquake in China
earthquake in China
China
I think you were only supposed to quote three times.
Correct. HSR did it wrong.
I think you were only supposed to quote three times.
And in which paragraph in the Manual of #$%^s and Trolls would that rule be?
World of Warcraft Official Forum Compendium III: Your Inner Troll, Courtesy of the Internet
Section 13:
Herein lies the rules to properly using quoting to be the best troll possible.
Article 37:
Thou must quote a post three times, shortening it each time until it reaches one or a few words (or symbols or the like) to mock the post in some sort of meaningful way. Quoting it more times will only earn you scorn. Quoting it fewer times will result in failed trolling as the point cannot be gotten across.
Post by
Hyperspacerebel
And in which paragraph in the Manual of #$%^s and Trolls would that rule be?
Post by
Interest
And in which paragraph in the Manual of #$%^s and Trolls would that rule be?
That is the manual.
It just goes by many names. I used the one most people would be likeliest to relate to.
Post by
Hyperspacerebel
If you follow a rule, you're not a real troll.
Poser.
Post by
Kristopher
*Things no one cares about*
*Some more things*
*Things for people to rage about*
Ok I did everyone's jobs for the day, find something else to do :P
Post by
Interest
If you follow a rule, you're not a real troll.
Poser.
Who said anything about it being a rule? It's more of a guideline.
Post by
Hyperspacerebel
If you follow a rule, you're not a real troll.
Poser.
Who said anything about it being a rule? It's more of a guideline.
Herein lies the
rules
to properly using quoting to be the best troll possible.
rules
(##RESPBREAK##)524##DELIM##Neutronimity##DELIM##Did you really have to do that?
Post by
160546
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Monday
Ohai Wowhead. It's been a while.
Nice pic, Interest.
Sup?
And lol HSR.
Post by
160546
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
Hyperspacerebel
What did I land in the middle of?
I've got a feeling we're not in Kansas anymore.
Post by
Interest
Typical HSR.
Lol.
Post by
Orranis
Someone help me with Physics Homework pl0x.
A cube with the volume of 8cm^3 is sinking at a rate of 3.0m/s2 in water, now I've calculated that the buoyancy is 0.80N upward (could be wrong), and I'm supposed to figure out the mass of the object based on this, but I don't think that's possible to find unless I know the gravitational force down.
Anyone see something I don't?
Post by
EpicDragon
Someone help me with Physics Homework pl0x.
A cube with the volume of 8cm^3 is sinking at a rate of 3.0m/s2 in water, now I've calculated that the buoyancy is 0.80N upward (could be wrong), and I'm supposed to figure out the mass of the object based on this, but I don't think that's possible to find unless I know the gravitational force down.
Anyone see something I don't?
Isn't gravitational force a constant?
Post by
Orranis
Someone help me with Physics Homework pl0x.
A cube with the volume of 8cm^3 is sinking at a rate of 3.0m/s2 in water, now I've calculated that the buoyancy is 0.80N upward (could be wrong), and I'm supposed to figure out the mass of the object based on this, but I don't think that's possible to find unless I know the gravitational force down.
Anyone see something I don't?
Isn't gravitational force a constant?
Grr, not gravitational force just force down in general (Fg, which is Gravitational Acceleration (10m/s^2* Mass). So either I have to have the mass to find out Fg or the Fg to find the mass, but we don't have Fg and we're looking for the mass. Maybe there's some round-a-bout way I'm not thinking of.
Post by
Hyperspacerebel
Typical HSR.
Lol.
Typical Interest failing at teh troll.
Post by
Orranis
Typical HSR.
Lol.
Typical Interest failing at teh troll.
Hsr, I'm looking at you.
Post by
Hyperspacerebel
Hsr, I'm looking at you.
You're looking at a computer screen, nub.
Post by
Orranis
Hsr, I'm looking at you.
You're looking at a computer screen, nub.
That's what you think.
Remember, Orranis is watching you not masturbate.
Post Reply
You are not logged in. Please
log in
to post a reply or
register
if you don't already have an account.