This site makes extensive use of JavaScript.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser.
Classic Theme
Thottbot Theme
Drop by and say hi! (Recycle Bin)
Post Reply
Return to board index
Post by
Random0098
Sounds like it's out of a Bond movie.
Post by
TheMediator
This makes me sick to my stomach.
"Model B would have an extra function — a dose of cyanide to remotely kill the wearer without muss or fuss if authorities deemed he'd become a public threat."
Thats the worst idea i´ve ever read about
How's that? That's one of the better ideas I've ever heard in a while, maybe not cyanide but something you could implant in someone's body that you could trigger to paralyze the person, so that you could let those who seem rehabilitated back into society, without having to worry about having to subdue them again if they turn aggressive.
Post by
238343
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
TheMediator
This makes me sick to my stomach.
"Model B would have an extra function — a dose of cyanide to remotely kill the wearer without muss or fuss if authorities deemed he'd become a public threat."
Thats the worst idea i´ve ever read about
How's that? That's one of the better ideas I've ever heard in a while, maybe not cyanide but something you could implant in someone's body that you could trigger to paralyze the person, so that you could let those who seem rehabilitated back into society, without having to worry about having to subdue them again if they turn aggressive.
They should not be able to kill someone without muss or fuss because the authorities think they are a public threat
... the police already do that plenty, have you ever heard of guns?
Post by
238343
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
TheMediator
This makes me sick to my stomach.
"Model B would have an extra function — a dose of cyanide to remotely kill the wearer without muss or fuss if authorities deemed he'd become a public threat."
Thats the worst idea i´ve ever read about
How's that? That's one of the better ideas I've ever heard in a while, maybe not cyanide but something you could implant in someone's body that you could trigger to paralyze the person, so that you could let those who seem rehabilitated back into society, without having to worry about having to subdue them again if they turn aggressive.
They should not be able to kill someone without muss or fuss because the authorities think they are a public threat
... the police already do that plenty, have you ever heard of guns?
Indeed i have,however this is more like if someone goes to google maps and finds a person,then instantly kills them for throwing something on the ground
If you're going to make up extreme examples, that's just saying I just go into a super market and shoot someone because they looked at me funny, therefore we shouldn't have guns.
Post by
238343
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
TheMediator
Breaking the pyramid,anyhow,im not saying we should have guns either,no guns would mean loads of less deaths in the world,however
killing someone for looking at you funny is kinda what could happen if this went trough,who says its hard to get a job where you decide who lives or dies trough this?
Say someone likes to kill people,he studies a couple of years then gets in,and could kill people with minimal effort
If someone wanted to do this, they already could. They could just fire nuclear missiles at Russia or something... oh wait there's checks in place that limit them from doing it unless they have higher approval.
Post by
238343
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
TheMediator
Someone could just as easily break in somewhere and fire nuclear missiles by pressing buttons.
Post by
238343
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
TheMediator
Someone could just as easily break in somewhere and fire nuclear missiles by pressing buttons.
I would like to think there are no nuclear missiles ready to be launched within minutes,however this is supposed to be done in a moment
Where does it say that?
Post by
238343
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
304197
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
BobTheGreat
where do babies come from?
Post by
MyTie
The system is too easily abused to be safe. The government, a hacker, or someone with a vendetta could use it for illegal or immoral means. Imagine if Nazi Germany had had that capability? Holocaust woulda been 10x as bad in about 3 minutes.
What if the person 'remotely' killed is driving down the road and his lifeless body lets the car plow into an oncoming schoolbus full of children?
Also the police having guns is not a parallel example. They don't "kill people all the time". Although I have my own critical opinions of police, I have to admit that the vast majority aren't gun slingers.
Post by
MyTie
where do babies come from?
ask your parents or google. although google will probably provide more accurate information.
Post by
304197
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
Post by
TheMediator
a hacker
That's the only valid point against these chips, and I agree it would be very dangerous if these chips existed and they were able to be hacked into. But the government could just as easily wipe us out with missiles, and someone with a vendetta without the skill to hack these things would just as much trouble trying to break into a government facility and activate these devices as they would firing missiles, so I don't see the point you're making with those other two examples.
And the police aren't the only people with guns, I merely used that example to say that because someone could kill with a gun, that following that logic guns should be banned.
Post by
MyTie
a hacker
That's the only valid point against these chips, and I agree it would be very dangerous if these chips existed and they were able to be hacked into. But the government could just as easily wipe us out with missiles, and someone with a vendetta without the skill to hack these things would just as much trouble trying to break into a government facility and activate these devices as they would firing missiles, so I don't see the point you're making with those other two examples.
And the police aren't the only people with guns, I merely used that example to say that because someone could kill with a gun, that following that logic guns should be banned.
Comparing guns to cianide containing government controled microchips? Can I call you an idiot? I mean... I don't want to just out and out flame you.. but that's bordering on the most idiotic comparison I've ever heard.... Like comparing a stubbed toe to brain cancer...
Post Reply
You are not logged in. Please
log in
to post a reply or
register
if you don't already have an account.