Why not use Fury 4 PvP?

Post by Snitzel

I've heard around that arms > fury at PvP.

Why is this? and with the new patch making titans grip with normal hit rating,is Fury viable for PvP?

Thanks

Post by 173088

This post was from a user who has deleted their account.

Post by Anarchy

you dont need hit rating in pvp anyways so the new patch wont do anything
the only reason why arms is "better" than fury in arena is because of mortal strike

Have you been living under a rock?
Fury gets furious attacks, in terms of efficiency it's better than mortal strike.

And you do need hit rating in PvP, about 165 or so,

Post by xstasi

Because PvP specs tend to increase burst damage, sacrificing long-term stable damage.
With fury, you'll be sure to deal a certain amount of damage in a certain time, while with arms, you might deal in five seconds what a fury warrior would take 20s to deal, as well as nothing, depending on luck.
Arms is pretty much luck based, since it mostly depends on procs.
With the proper luck, you are able to shoot down pretty much any class in no time (chance to execute at any health, heavy rage generation, keep rage on execute, any bells blinking? - also, overpower with +50% crit and +100% damage to crits + bleeding effect, dodge this rogue!).
Also, arms offers some nifty bonuses such as healing when rooted, rage conservation when stance-dancing (battle-charge-mortal strike-defensive-disarm-zerk-pew pew-enemy dodges-battle-overpower-and so on), as well as reduced stuns.
This is all stuff that's pretty useless in PvE, but allows you a higher survavibility and damage output in PvP.

Why not use Fury 4 PvP?

Post Reply