couldnt there be 1 universal weapon that all classes and specs could use and then if .fx. a retri pally got the universal weapon then it would transform into a 2 handed weapon with strenght and stamina this would make it alot easyer to gear up and u wouldnt have to w8 a year for a 2 handed weapon.
This post was from a user who has deleted their account.
If this aint tagged "classes. Rogue" and it lacks expertise, i cant see why it shouldnt also work as a hunter weapon, hunters can dual wield too, and seek the same stats (with the exception of expertise although which is not completely useless, it is less useful) as rogues. Enh shammies want slow weps, so do fury warrs even if they are smf, so no daggers for them, but a dagger is a even toss between rogue and hunter.
You sir..are my hero Cerana....Hrethgir from Demon Soul here, a fellow warrior and I must say that as a Warrior, I try to ignore the presence of DK's as much as possible as well. I know theres no way Blizzard could get rid of them now but they really did not need to make a melee tanking class that uses 2-handers as their tanking weapon. Worst game design choice they've ever made if I may say so myself. Basically overfavored DK's when Shadowmourne came out with their whole "look at me I can use Shadowmourne as a tanking and dps weapon so the GM should favor the DK's in terms of who gets to make it first during ICC" bullcrap.Also I thought this was a joke at first, I have quite seriously been hoping they would make the next legendary after Tarecgosa a tanking item of some sort...maybe a shield for warriors/paladins or a piece of armor for DK's and druids with an awesome on use proc...wouldn't care if it was just a shield for warriors/paladins (though i don't necessarily tank myself), but I really don't feel that they need to give rogues another legendary just because some of them at Blizztard play one. Who knows maybe we were wrong about the whole Blizz plays Mages thing and actually play Rogues instead. I guess we'll see if they were telling the truth soon but this just seems so dumb on their part...so does the whole LFR easier difficulty thing along with specific achievements for that. It's basically sounding like an "easymode" for pugs that don't raid in guilds so that EVERYONE, yes ABSOLUTELY EVERYONE CAN NOW SEE THE CONTENT! Since that's Blizztard's new philosophy...if everyone can't see the content (even 12 year olds and the mentally handicapped) then they are doing something wrong.. O_oP.S. Also Dear Kaelessan...blahblahblahblahblahblahblahh. People said they weren't leaving WoW until they actually saw whether or not this was actually true. So your entire post is basically just QQ which is what you were nagging about in your monologue there.
By casedistorted 1 hr 32 min ago (Patch 4.2.2)if everyone can't see the content (even 12 year olds and the mentally handicapped) then they are doing something wrong.. O_oJudgemental and elitist much?
"Hunter weapon"JKSorry had to say it. I guess it is cool rogues get a specific legendary.
What the hell is this, a legendary weapon for one class? I hope they'll change their mind and make a new Thunderfury.
Leaning away from the topic at hand:Using LFR, will someone be able to work on the components of Dragonswrath?
Oh come on! We need a legendary tank shield!...How about ? Sounds pretty sick to me...
well maybe they will make a 60 or 65 agi enchant for 1h weapons? Because having this dagger and my hunter not being able to use it sucks. It means our two new guys both rogues will get it, while the long time players get ^&*!.
I have an idea, the dagger should be a Fang of Deathwing, that makes it fit into the Lore of the expansion and...Hell it's Made out of one of Deathwings Fangs